Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Bubbly Reality

=============================================================
by Philipina A. Marcelo

Now that an economic bubble burst in the West, it’s not hard to imagine how the vulnerable economies of the developing countries in the East can be blown away to pieces as a consequence.  Right now, we don’t see that happening as yet, following the violent burst of the housing bubble in the US that sent unprecedented volume of worms all over Wall Street crawling out to expose themselves in daylight, at the disgust of everyone except those greedy financial crooks with shredded moral fiber that coughed them out in the first place.  It seems that the reduced strength of their gut juices, fermented from excessive supply of greed-raked wealth, is no longer a viable environment for the worms to thrive.  But all these talks about what I consider as the US adopting a ‘self-preservation’ strategy to address the financial crisis that brought down the world financial fortress is scaring the hell out of me.  Take this article for example:

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/22/opinion/22krugman.html?em

 

I have always been an admirer of Prof. Krugman, and so, it becomes more distressful for me to read an article by the Nobel Laureate bearing a sunny prospective for the US, but of gloomy note for the developing countries, including mine.  Although I agree to most points made by Prof. Krugman, including that about the necessity of US closing the gap in their trade deficit by becoming more self-reliant, thereby, creating much needed job opportunities and stimulating local productivity, I fear about what that would do to countries of weaker economies that are, in one way or another, tied to the US through globalized economy.   Add to that the utter inability of allegedly corrupt governments, such as that of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s in the Philippines, to respond to the pressing need of creating local jobs, and it becomes even gloomier.  


Right now, there are many Filipino college graduates who work in Call Centers, through services outsourced by American companies, whose college preparations are much advanced than what a Call Center usual job requires, but they take the job anyway out of necessity - to survive.  Still, a sizeable Filipino work force is employed in companies that export commodities to the US and to Europe.  When services outsourcing are stopped and importation lessened by the US, I wonder how the multitude of Call Centers and export company workers would take the blow.  In the case of the Philippines, I wonder how much effort is being exerted in cushioning the blow for the common Filipino, especially those living below poverty line.  I wonder if it is just wishful thinking to imagine Gloria Arroyo’s government working out a long-term and sustainable solution to the awful ripples of this category 5 financial crisis that is about to hit the Philippines, rather than figuring out how much more public fund is left for them to fish into their pockets and how are they going to do it with the remaining time they have in the government!

 

In the manufacturing front, I wonder what will become of the present manufacture output of China.  If the US cuts on its importation of Chinese goods, where would China peddle the low-cost commodities it produces in order to sustain its own economic growth?  I fear that Chinese goods find their way to China’s neighboring developing countries with weaker and less competitive manufacturing arm.  In fact, they are already starting to dominate the Philippine market these days!  The last time I shopped for a pair of flip-flops in the second biggest mall in the Philippines, it was impossible to find Philippine-made ones!  Instead, I saw more than a dozen variants of flip-flops, all bearing the "Made in China" tag.  The store manager advised me that if I really wanted a pair of Philippine-made flip-flops, I could probably find them in the sidewalks by the marketplace!  Now, that's not even ironic - that's outrageous!  He explained that it’s not a question of quality or lack of creativity in Filipino products that's making it doubly hard for them to find their way into these big malls, it's all about cheap.  It's cheaper for big stores to import in bulk from China than to buy in smaller volumes from Philippine manufacturers.  And if these stores are to keep their thousands of employees in the payroll, the choice is clear - cheap!  He summed the problem as the inability of Filipino manufacturers to respond to growing demands for manufactured goods.  And because the Chinese manufacturing arm is built to provide the then voluminous demands of the West, it would be hard for countries of weaker manufacturing arms, like the Philippines, to compete when China decides to 'invade' their local stores with its cheap produce.  Again, add to that the willingness of corrupt governments to sell their countries’ future to the highest bidder rather than improving the capabilities and competitiveness of local manufacturers, just to feed their maniacal need to feel the pleasure of excessive wealth in their pockets, and we have a potentially grim situation.

 

If only governments of developing countries, take the present global financial crisis as an opportunity to work out a long-term economic strategy that will build a more sustainable and resilient financial architecture, it would be a welcome ray of hope in the midst of this economic gloom that we are experiencing today.  About a couple of months ago, when all the stock markets  in the four corners of the planet were crashing left and right in an unprecedented speed and breadth, evoking panic everywhere, I remember seeing Prof. Jeffrey Sachs – another prominent and respected economist, graced an interview in a cable network news.  He advised that Asian developing economies should figure out a way to strengthen themselves where they will not be fully dependent on the more developed Western economies so they can effectively shield themselves from a financial crisis in the West.  After watching the Indonesian stock market freefalling all morning and closing on midday after a horrendous crash, I dismissed Prof. Sachs’ remarks that day as arrogant and insensitive, in spite of my admiration for him. But now that the dust has settled, and the world is looking at the financial catastrophe with shorter wave of panic, what he said made sense.  I guess, it’s a part of a corrupt government’s ploy and irresponsible acts to bring some sense of false security to its people by tying its economy to a robust Western economy albeit engulfed in a menacing bubble, bailing itself out from the responsibility of building a strong local financial architecture.  And when the bubble bursts and financial crisis errupts, it's very convenient to point to the West and just leave the citizens on their own to wallow in misery.  And then, when nobody is looking, feed itself to the people’s coffer.  The only difference with the Arroyo government is that it feeds its corrupt self with tax payers' money to gross obesity even when people are protesting, and dying of hunger and hard labor!  Talk about worm-infested all-bubbly fermented gut!  

 

Happy Christmas!



Friday, December 19, 2008

That Street called GREED...

==================================================
by Philipina A. Marcelo



I dare everyone who can distinguish between wrong and very, very wrong to read the article below without either shedding a tear of deep frustration or bringing his/her fist to a crash on the nearest solid surface out of, yes, deep frustration!

So, what would these people do with all that money? Sorry, I am just a teacher - my job description does not include the practice of greed. We actually do real work with real outcomes for whatever little money we earn in the Academe! Many of us reach the end of their professional journey without seeing or knowing what a million dollars look or feel like in their pockets. And yet, it's the likes of us, and those who have even less than what we have that bail out crooks, with fast mouths and even faster hands, who are suffocating from their own ballooned greediness soaring high in that forsaken Street called GREED where money is everybody's daily bread!

While the world endure the painful consequences of greed on Wall Street, in my mind, a question presses for an answer: now that the toxicity of Wall Street's bread proved catastrophic to the whole world, would it finally deflate that menace of greed balloon? I hope for a sane answer!

***

Saturday, November 1, 2008

The One: BarackO

======================================================

by Philipina A. Marcelo

 

In four days, the lone Superpower on the planet will vote for its new leader… and the world watches eagerly, awaits results anxiously while it desperately tries to defend its financial fortress from the global economic meltdown that’s closing in around it.  I, myself, have been burning the worldwide web, looking for some comfort from news articles and political expert opinions on the 2008 US Election, keeping an eye for possible redemption from the financial crisis from heaps and heaps of reading materials about the two contenders, Senators Barack Obama and John McCain!  Without a doubt, the financial crisis had been making a hole at the bottom of everybody’s purse at the moment, and presumably throughout a considerable period in the near and distant grim future.  And so, the world holds its breath, as it once again, looks to the West and hopes for the best.

 

The considerable endorsement articles I’ve read rang some sort of bias on different levels, while some were coupled with indiscreet ideological partisanship; still others are peppered with insults emanating from frustration and dismay from the present economic state and international image of the United States of America.  From among a sea of candidate endorsements, I found one that’s refreshingly unbiased, or at least, the least biased among so many:


http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=12511171

 

The article above is very well-thought of and very well-written.  It points out both the weaknesses and strengths of the two candidates, side by side.  It does not endorse Sen. Obama in a frenzied, politically charged fanatism nor does it lambast Sen. McCain unfairly and maliciously.  Instead, it points out how Sen. Obama rose from an unknown, inexperienced presidential hopeful into the very embodiment of hope and change that America needs amidst this tumultuous time - organized leadership that overcame huge challenges from the start of his campaign, rigorous and disciplined pursuit of his goals and that of his followers, willingness to listen and learn from the most brilliant minds to the smallest member of the society to come up with a political platform that could work for everyone, calm and cool confidence in the face of aggressive adversaries, and the willingness to extend a hand of reconciliation to turn foes into allies (It was joy to watch him embrace the Clintons during his many rallies, which undoubtedly added to the pride of reconciled Democrats, electrifying them to charge for victory come Election Day.) - all of which are necessary quality of a leader as America, and the world, faces a challenge that it has never faced before.  


Admittedly, I was an ardent supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton during the Democratic primaries, and I proudly remain to be a Hillaryite, even after the Democrats decided that she was too consumed by her desire to be the next American President that she went on a spontaneous combustion towards the end of the primaries.  I maintain that she has what it takes to be a great leader, too, just like Bill Clinton... only maybe better.  But after the primaries, watching Sen. Obama's steady evolution into a leader that the world by and large can appreciate, I was won over.  This is not to say, however, that Sen. McCain is a totally worthless candidate, because he is worthy, too... or was, as shown by his sterling records as a soldier and a maverick senator, that is, until partisan politics sucked the better of him in the course of the presidential campaign.  The biggest and probably the worst self-destructing compromise he could ever do in his lifetime is choosing a nincompoop that is Sarah Palin for a running mate at a time when the American VP Office could mean flourish or perish for the global community!  Some of these issues were detailed in the Economist endorsement, which I believe, is a worthwhile read for those who haven’t made up their minds and for those who have but could do a bit of reassessment of their decision before finally casting their votes.  


Although, like the Economist, most of the global community, myself included, do not have a vote in the US Election, the far-reaching effects of the present global financial crisis that originated from Wall Street, and therefore, must be abated from Wall Street, show more than ever before that whether Americans like it or not, the rest of the global community has a stake in their Presidential Election!  And, their decision is a key as to how the free world will proceed forward after getting a good beating from the financial crisis.  It will be tough, but through wars and adversaries, America has shown its resilience many times before.  And through the help of its allies, it has risen to become the lone Superpower in the free world.  Unlike many, I do not have a big problem about that... because which developed country in this planet has as much tolerance and offers as vast an access to opportunities to as many peoples in the world as the United States does?  It is still one of the few developed nations where citizens from less fortunate nations can labor without being looked down to inhumanely, or spitted on like a piece of crap on a daily basis, or persecuted unjustly for their faith or sexual orientation, or even beaten to death like an unworthy animal.  There are subtle (and sometimes, not-so-subtle) shows of intolerance, that's for sure, especially during the Bush era, but foreigners may still take refuge from American policies of co-existence.  Sure, they usually put their own interests in the forefront, but who doesn't?  Indeed, America does have good things that could be worthwhile for the world to learn.  Therefore, Americans should be able to figure this one out, too.  There is only one difference between their past and their present circumstances – now, they stand as a part of a whole, which is the global community.  It is the inability to grasp this new reality for the United States of America that makes ultra-conservative, inward-looking, global know-how-deprived, and intellectually-challenged like Sarah Palin absolutely inadequate to become the nation's Number Two!  But, alas, Sarah Palin, thankfully, does not represent Americans of today, not even the majority of Republicans. (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/31/us/politics/31poll.html?_r=1&oref=slogin) 


The shocking occurrence of 9/11 and how the Americans of this generation came together to stand for their country against the barbaric act of terrorism, I believe, is a defining moment for the United States of America – as a Nation.  The 2008 Presidential Election is proving to be yet another defining moment for the United States of America – this time, not just as a nation, but also and more importantly, as a vital part (or leader, if the Americans still want it) of a free global community, whose very existence today is the result of democracy that the United States of America itself had ardently spoused for the last so many decades.  While it is true that the free market that it created proved to be an imperfect one, the repercussions of its excesses and unwarranted deregulation, everyone in the world is enduring today, it did introduce a new way by which members of the global community may interact and grow as one.  Leaders of nations that are key players in the global economic architecture of today coming together to confront the challenges of the present financial crisis is an indication that the world is ready to grow as one community.  Sadly, it takes a financial catastrophe to make this happen.  But, no matter, at least now, we see ourselves as one community.  And now, this community looks to America in this crucial moment, when its sustainable existence is in peril.

 

As an individual who looks up to America as a generous provider of a lasting gift that is an excellent Academic training, and as a frequent visitor who revere America for its embrace as it reveals eagerly how absolutely exciting it can be to be in that melting pot where everyone is accepted as an important ingredient of a blend, I am forever grateful.  I would like to believe that the Bush doctrine with all its short-sightedness and lack of intellectual ingredients in its policies, both local and foreign, is just a temporary glitch in the American psyche.  As I enjoy America's gift of topnotch education and spreading America's message of hope in my own country, I continue to pray that this tradition of hope remains alive in the American soil for others to enjoy in many generations to come.  And this, I reckon, depends on how America votes in four days’ time.  


Therefore, I say, “vote wisely, America!”


Wednesday, October 29, 2008

WhatchaMcCa(ll)in' Palin

====================================================

by Philipina A. Marcelo


Trying to veer away from the dizzying roller coaster ride of global stock market watch, I shifted focus on the next news headline-hogging event of these days – the US Presidential election, and came across this article:


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/opinion/26dowd.html?em


It amuses me that Imelda Marcos had to be mentioned in Maureen Dowd's caricature of the Republican VP Barbie, Sarah WhatchaMcCa(ll)in’ Palin!  Imelda Marcos, as far as I’m concerned, is the modern symbol of cringe-enducing shallowness and loathsome feminine excesses - all symptoms of drunkenness from an abuse of new-found power after spending considerable time suppressing a hunger for the bourgeois status.  Watching Sarah Palin transformed in just a few weeks from this interesting political rock star - quite endearing to feminine fanhood, almost amazing  - to this totally disappointing seat of abysmal shallowness when put under substance check, it’s nauseating and almost physically painful to catch a glimpse of her on TV, in all her shrill gory!  It’s amazing how some women (and men, too) find it acceptable, with not a single ounce of guilt, to use charm as a valid excuse for lack of real capability.  And, it’s frustrating that some people do actually fall for such deceitful and manipulative use of charisma.  


When an Independent, Republican-leaning friend of mine (whose wife is a Democrat) from Houston, TX opined that maybe McCain, being a "comeback kid" might just pull off a last-minute new trick from his maverick hat to win the elections, I replied: "Nah... he was definitely the 'last man standing' (from an array of inadequate ones) at the end of the Republican primaries - that's not necessarily being a 'comeback kid', is it?  And when he chose for a running mate some shrill lipsticked loose cannon who uses the 's word', 'terrorism' and 'patriotism' without thinking when she's not shooting moose from within waving distance from Putin's neighborhood (which she considers a legit exposure to foreign diplomacy, mind you), he didn't do his campaign any favor either!"  Alright, granting that I had this exchange with my friend right after Gen. Colin Powell endorsed the Barackster, where he used very well-chosen words that I don't think Sarah Palin will ever deserve in this lifetime, I was already completely dismayed by the Republican VP Barbie's exposed shallowness during her interviews with Charles Gibson and Katie Couric.  I remember listening to her with my eyes and mouth wide open - in shock, and later in disgust! How can she run for the second highest seat of authority in the United States of America when she's clueless about the goings on outside of the State of Alaska?!  It sure looked like a case of who needs-substance-when-I've-got-this-rockin'-load-a-charm!  One thing is for sure, while she's not exactly a Paris Hilton, she's definitely no Hillary Clinton, in terms of substance either!  


So, what can I say about WhatchaMcCa(ll)in’?  The hot mama is a babe, but definitely not a sister!  


Monday, October 27, 2008

YouTube-ing it

=====================================================

In the middle of my struggles to finish an agonizingly long research project, revisions to a research grant, and a couple of overdue research papers, I came across this article:


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/26/business/26proto.html


Needless to say, I got derailed more than I already was!   As I hauled myself out of the bunker, I was debating with myself whether all this never ending research and publications drama should be coursed through the “conventional” path to reach a sizeable target audience, or rolled faster through the heavily media-assisted path, a.k.a. YouTube!  Just for the sake of argument, I imagined myself YouTubing my work on the mathematical modeling of the ultrafiltration of virgin whey.   I cringed at the thought!  So much for “wow factor”!  I decided I wasn’t telegenic  (or videogenic) enough to do a Johnny Chung Lee!  Then again, maybe it’s not about telegenicity, maybe it’s more about the ingenuity of the invention.  And, more importantly, it’s probably about the appeal of the invention to an audience that makes YouTube thrive.  In any case, I don’t expect so many YouTube enthusiasts would spend precious minutes trying to decipher why a two-parameter flux model is advantageous in designing batch ultrafiltration system for the processing of virgin whey.  Are you yawning already?  I thought so... my point exactly!



Monday, October 13, 2008

Nobel-ish

=============================================================


Relaxing on a Friday evening, I stumbled upon the on-line article below:


http://www.slate.com/id/2201447/#return


Ah, the beautiful land of 9 million people that is Sweden, and the amazing melting pot that is the United States of America!  Having lived in both countries for considerable period of time – as a student, and therefore an outsider who voraciously took advantage of every opportunity to learn the two countries' respective cultures that their home-grown artists muse about, I cannot help but burst out laughing while reading the article.  I feel I know a little secret that Adam Kirsch doesn’t that I find his rants totally amusing.  This doesn't mean I don't respect his opinion, because I do.  For all I know, he's actually humoring his readers!  For sure, Kirsch merely strengthened my resolve to spend the next two weeks of semestral break to reach some sort of intimacy with Philip Roth’s Nobel-ish literary genius.  I can't wait….


Friday, September 19, 2008

Wednesday triple treat

An anticipated hectic day turned out to be one fine day....
==========================================================
by Philipina A. Marcelo


I had a great Wednesday this week!

Wednesday is usually drab for me. It’s the middle of the week, and not much is usually happening. So, when I got Wednesday as my free day in the University this semester, I was happy! Although it meant I would have to show up for a half-day work on Saturday, the thought of sleeping in, spending three hours at the foot spa where I get foot scrub and massage and then getting my feet wrapped in warm paraffin before getting a pedicure while I devour the latest works of my fave novelists, and then getting a facial while I doze off afterwards, and waking my senses up with the wonderful smell of freshly brewed coffee and the sweet flavor of cinnamon in freshly baked bread roll, both consumed leisurely in my fave cozy coffee shop, and then end my day watching the amazing Manila sunset – all in the middle of the week really sounded like the very best deal for an academic con scientist like myself! And so, when the going gets tough on Mondays and Tuesdays, I always remind myself, “hey, Wednesday is just around the corner, baby!” And, it always cheered me up.

So far, so good! And then came the invitations from Fulbright/Philippine-American Educational Foundation (PAEF) and my Alumni Association for meetings, and the confirmation of my eye check-up – all on a Wednesday, in three different parts of Mega-Manila! I winced at the thought of missing my free day especially that I was anticipating insane Monday and Tuesday, which I was right! So, I went to bed on Tuesday night wincing. Little did I know that I was in for a triple treat… and I’m not just talking about the spa kind of treat either!

First, after a few morning crunches I did a quick check at my e-mailbox. I couldn’t help but squeal excitedly at what I found! A friend of mine sent me a weblink to a book entitled, “Handbook of Membrane Separations: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food, and Biotechnological Applications”, where I co-wrote one chapter with my PhD advisor during the last year of my graduate stint at Cornell. It’s finally out! I hurriedly checked out the link, and there it was – my name in the by-line of one of the chapters! All of a sudden, the memories of the painful but exhilarating experience of going through volumes and volumes of technical papers to put that chapter together day in and day out for almost 12 long months, while I labored on my dissertation, came rushing back to me! Just thinking about those days brought pain that was almost physical. And then, I stared again at the webpage, and what I felt was pure joy! There it was… almost one year of my life that I thought went to waste. I scrolled up and down the page… reading the bylines was like reading the Who’s Who in membrane technology… and my name got inserted in it – sweet!

The good news that greeted my day made me almost forgot about my unfolding busy day until my phone rang, just before 10:00 in the morning. It was my College classmate, reminding me of our meeting in the evening. An incoming call interrupted our conversation. I said goodbye to her and picked up the other line. It was the eye clinic clerk, reminding me that my appointment is in one hour, which means that I would need to fly to get there on time! I looked at the pair of polka dot pajamas I was still wearing and winced!

By some stroke of miracle, I got to the clinic only three minutes late, still managing to fix myself to look decent… and I didn’t fly either! After paying for my new pair of contact lenses, I exhaled and let myself dream of Thai food for lunch, after all, I have a reason to celebrate! There was a good one close by. And then my phone made a tooting sound – a text message. It was from my student. They needed my signature immediately on a document for our activity on Monday. It can’t wait another day. He was sorry he forgot to give it to me yesterday. The University is 45 minutes away from the clinic – when the Manila traffic is being kind! I sighed, looked at my watch and winced! Goodbye Thai lunch, hello take-out cold sandwich!

I got to the University with only an hour and a half before my Fulbright appointment… and the meeting venue is about an hour away! I looked for my student, he was looking for me, too… we missed each other three times… 15 minutes gone. I winced! I decided to sit in one spot. He found me. I signed the documents and ran! Again, by some stroke of miracle, I was early by 5 minutes for the Fulbright meeting. I didn’t bother to analyze how that happened. I just raised my face to heaven and said a little prayer of thanks. It turned out, I was bound to receive a bonus, too!

The Fulbright event was a welcome reception for the new Public Affairs Officer (PAO) of the
Fulbright... and experience like no other.
US Embassy in Manila, Mr. Richard W. Nelson. Being the new PAO, Mr. Nelson will also serve as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of PAEF for the next three years. Thus, the PAEF welcome reception. As usual, it was great to see the wonderful people of PAEF, and as always, it was a delight to socialize with the Fulbrighters. It felt like being put in the same room as some of the very best minds that you can find in the Philippine archipelago – always a humbling experience, but awesome nonetheless! The conversations are always interesting, engaging and absolutely absorbing... not to mention hilarious – even without the help of crisp champagne, mind you! But that wasn’t the second treat I was talking about.

After all the welcome remarks for Mr. Nelson and his wife were said by representatives of the different PAEF groups of scholars, Mr. Nelson walked behind the podium to cordially acknowledge the warm welcome. Apparently, this is his third time to be in the Philippines with his family on an official mission, having finished one recently in Cameroon. Having travelled all over the globe, he talked fondly about how he thinks of his family as the micro-United Nations. He was born in Alaska – back in the days when Alaska was just a US territory rather than a State, which makes him wonder often enough if he was really born an American. His wife is a Filipina. His eldest son was born in South Africa, and his youngest in Japan. He said he is happy to be back in Manila, where he feels at home – he and his kids (and his wife, of course) even speak the language! He congratulated all the Fulbright and PAEF alumni. And then, without a hint, he made special mention of those who chose to take a career in the Academia. He said he commends those scholars who chose Academia for their career path in spite of the many opportunities in front of them and even when they knew that it is not as financially rewarding compared with other career paths. He made mention of the on-going Presidential campaign in the US, and how different issues are being debated upon in the US today. He said that the candidates and the electorates may continue to argue about which issue is most important, and some would say economic policies are paramount concern, while others would say that strengthening international relations and diplomacy should be addressed first. Others would insist that research on renewable energy and environmental issues must be put on a fast track. Still, others would insist that immigration policies must be at the top of the agenda, while others would argue that national security must be addressed first and foremost. And yet, when you listen closely, addressing any, or all, of the issues all boil down to education. He said that a base knowledge should be established through sound educational system in order for people to actually come up with policies that will work in the sustainable future. And, in developing countries like the Philippines, education plays a critical role in digging themselves out of poverty, and start moving forward. Therefore, bringing education to all the citizens of any country must be a priority. Now, this is a man who has served many places in the world as a public official, bringing in his firsthand knowledge to us. I know he was not just being cute. Needless to say, I agree with Mr. Nelson 100%. This is why, regardless of all the disadvantages, I chose a career in the Academia.

I skipped dinner at the PAEF reception to try and catch my Alumni meeting on the other side of town, which also included dinner. I left the PAEF Office feeling I didn’t need any food, I got the sustenance I needed – the affirmation that all the sleepless nights creating and re-creating teaching materials is all worth it. What a treat!

The traffic en route to my University where my Alumni meeting was going to be held was quite burdensome. It was on standstill several times along the way. The slow moving traffic brought my attention to the malnourished street children in their raggedy clothes walking aimlessly in the light shower, zigzagging the vehicles caught up in the slow-moving traffic. By the emptiness in their faces and the seeming desperation of their situation at so young an age, it’s quite painful to imagine how the next years of their lives, if any, would be like. Mr. Nelson’s voice kept resonating in my ears. Education is needed to dig us out of poverty. Those kids should be at home, studying for the next day of school. In the years to come, they should be rushing to their alumni meeting from a Fulbright scholars’ meeting, too! All of a sudden, my hectic day became so much more of a blessing rather than a burden. Once again, I raised my face to heaven and murmured a prayer of thanks.

Education is needed to dig us out of poverty. It kept humming inside my head, building my resolve to stay focused on my goals as an Academician. All of a sudden, the traffic eased out, and the road to my University went by in a sweeping speed. And then, in the midst of the Manila frenzied noise and twinkling lights amidst the gathering darkness, the serene blue cross atop the administration building of my University - the 397 years old Pontifical and Royal University of Santo Tomas, the Catholic University of the Philippines, emerged, as if to guide me where to head to. It was such a beautiful sight to behold, it made me want to rush to it.

I arrived in the University only 15 minutes late for the two-hour consultative meeting with the Chemical Engineering Department alumni. The Department will hold its 75th founding anniversary in AY 2009-2010. “Brilliance Across Generations” was going to be the theme. It will be the Department’s Diamond Anniversary, and therefore, we thought it was fitting to pay tribute to its alumni whose accomplishments is making the Department shine like a brilliant piece of exquisitely cut diamond. The Department has lined up several activities, and that evening was the first gathering to let everyone know of the plans and encourage their participation. Indeed, the alumni represented several generations of brilliant Thomasian Engineers from different fields imaginable, each wearing a beautifully designed button that said, “Proud to be a Thomasian Engineer”!

Being late, I didn’t want to attract attention, so I tiptoed into the dining room where everybody is socializing over sumptuous dinner in preparation for the meeting, which will be held in the Conference Hall, adjacent to the room. One person saw me, yelled my name…

and before I could even respond, there was a mob of former students greeting me like I was
University of Santo Tomas... Pontifical, Catholic.
Mother Teresa or something! Many of the younger ones, of course, looked familiar… I remember all the childlike faces in the Unit Operations Laboratory and in the lecture rooms where we were all “battered” by Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Chemical Kinetics and Reactor Design, and Numerical Methods! But, of course, judging from how all of them looked important in their respective organizations now, looked like we won the battle somehow! In an instant, I have a handful of business cards in my hand… positions like “Scientist”, “Research Specialist”, “Project Engineer” and even “President and General Manager” swam in my eyes! And, I wondered how old have I become? How the heck did I contribute in making a “President and General Manager” of a company? I was just blown away!

After the meeting, we said our endless goodbyes. It was a very happy and nostalgic social event, with our alumni telling us of their pursuits and what have you. It was hard not to be emotional, watching those “kids” transformed into accomplished individuals in so short a time. What was marvelous was how they still spoke to us with almost reverence – little Academic people that we are. At the back of my head, I saw Mr. Nelson’s kind face, smiling and seemed to be nodding his head. And, I indulged voraciously, savoring that wonderful moment - that awesome treat, lest it doesn’t happen again.

I stepped out of the building with the blue cross atop my university seeming eager to partake at my awe as I closed my day. With the relentless Manila traffic, the way home was still slow even after rush hours. As the traffic crawled, I stared out of the window… the street children are lined up at the sidewalk, curled up on filthy cardboards that were their beds in the open air, no blankets despite the light drizzle. I was going to worry about my hectic schedule on the morrow, but my worries were snatched from me by those kids whose tomorrow was so uncertain… and yet, I know that they, too, can see the blue cross atop my university’s administration building where they lay. And, as it flickered in the darkness, I was certain that it was bringing forth some warmth of hope to those children. All of a sudden, I imagined those kids as diamonds… perhaps, rough and dull at the moment, but with some polishing and patient cutting, they, too will shine like those “kids” we nurtured in the university.

I murmured a prayer of thanks as I allowed myself to fall asleep. Education is needed to dig us out of poverty. That is hardly a roadmap, and yet, I know now that there is hope somehow.


Wednesday, September 10, 2008

History unfolds in the 2008 US Open Men’s Championship – Roger that!

A fan rejoices on the triumph of a great champion....
==============================================================
by Philipina A. Marcelo

Once an awesome champion will always be an awesome champion!

Roger Federer showed exactly what that meant on Monday, 8th of September 2008, as he claimed his fifth US Open Men's championship trophy – putting a distinction to himself as the only tennis player who won five straight championships in both the US Open and Wimbledon! As he received his 13th major title in the US Open this year, he moved up merely a beat closer to Pete Sampras’s 14 career majors… and he’s only 27 years old! More than anything else, his US Open win this year puts all doubts to rest that
El Maestro is over and out. These speculations mushroomed following his back-to-back defeat in Roland Garros in Paris and in the All England Club in Wimbledon by Rafael Nadal, who in the process snatched the Number One in the World spot from Federer, after a record breaking 237 straight weeks at the top. Federer will continue his run for history - that’s for sure. He said it so himself, “One thing's for sure, I'm not going to stop at 13. That would be terrible.”

A few months back, I was ranting as a disgruntled fan, trying to understand the lack of brilliance in Federer’s usually awesome game at the 2008 French Open… which is not to belittle Rafael Nadal’s talents because surely he has the heart of a champion, too. But it was hard to accept how, without a warning, the distinct Federer backhand got slapped back by that do-or-die ball scavenging machine called Rafael Nadal, the dangerous forehand became less lethal - even on grass later in Wimbledon, the graceful passing shots became awkward attempts at passing the shots, the entertaining variety turned to disturbing volatility, the out-of this-world Federer accuracy was reduced to “normalcy” that was definitely less than his gifts, and the usually intelligent game became a less inspired attempt to stay in the game! It was perplexing to say the very least. But what disgruntled me the most was how he showed signs of giving up when the going got tough in Roland Garros, because what makes him the greatest champion ever, as far as I’m concerned, is his ability to stay calm and will himself to winning matches – big or small, regardless of pressure… not just for the sake of winning, but more so for the love of the sport. Any tennis fan could discern how Roger Federer’s heart beats for the sport as he follows the ball with his eyes every single time that it approaches his end of the court, hits his racket, and fly down the line on his opponent’s end of the court. The sheer awesomeness of his talents and how he uses such talents to perfect every single stroke that he does on court can make every tennis enthusiast fall head over heels with the sport. Add to that the cool confidence, which is always balanced by wit and sense of humor, that he displays on and off the court makes him indeed the best ambassador that the sport could ever hope for!

On Monday, I saw the brilliance shine forth in the magnificent Arthur Ashe Stadium once again… not quite as exhilarating as last year, but it was there just the same. Andy Murray, with all his own talents and strong will to win was simply overpowered – and he made no excuses either. Perhaps, a precipitation from his men's doubles stint at the Beijing Olympics where he and Stanislas Wawrinka captured the gold for Switzerland, Federer’s added confidence at the net as he tackled Murray showed how he has added yet another number in his repertoire that he could summon when the need arises. Only time will tell how this would help him fetch more of the championship trophies that are up for grabs in the sporting seasons to come. With all the challenges that he endured throughout this season to reach the finals of the US Open and how he celebrated a big point won over Andy Murray with a fist pump and a mighty bellow that reverberated over at Arthur Ashe as if that was the very first time in his career to win a big point like that, perhaps, he discovered a new meaning of the sport that no one else but himself would ever understand. And that might just up the level of his game to yet another high - more awesome than awesome!


People may continue to speculate on his "shaky" stance on court these days, but one thing is for sure, El Maestro still reigns in the tennis world. He understands what winning means and can still will himself to win especially when winning means more than just lifting the victor’s cup, but also about keeping the faith of the multitude of believers in the sport, including himself. He may not be the Number One in the World at the moment, but to me (and without a doubt to many others, too), he is, and will always be, the best tennis champion in the world - ever. Roger that!



***
(Photo: Catching tennis fever in Malaysia with new and old friends. I traveled to Malaysia in November 2007 to visit a good friend and to catch the Federer-Sampras exhibition match. In the process, I made new friends. My friends and I couldn't catch El Maestro in the flesh after the match, and so we settled for the flattened larger-than-life version on the wall to take photo with.)

Monday, June 9, 2008

French Open 2008: How Roger Federer was defeated by himself at Roland Garros

A disgruntled fan's rant
==============================================================

After Roger Federer cleared the quarterfinal hurdle that’s Fernando Gonzalez in the 2008 French Open, I excitedly declared to my friend: “My gut feel tells me that this is going to be the year when Roger Federer finally wins Roland Garros. You’ll see.”

Apparently, I spoke too soon. I was shocked by the way he suffocated from Rafael Nadal's dust rather than capturing the crown in that one elusive clay court in the City of Lights. 6-1, 6-3, 6-0, IMAGINE? It's the most shockingly disappointing finals I've ever seen from the supposed "greatest" tennis master! He was absolutely grated by Nadal! And, that's only because he let the powerhouse Spaniard step all over him. Even Nadal himself didn't seem to enjoy mincing an opponent without a real challenge - he even apologized in the end. Nadal was probably expecting to be pushed to his limits, but Federer didn't seem to have a strong resolve to tackle Nadal and win this year's French Open.

Although he lost the opening set in his quaterfinal match with Fernando Gonzalez, Roger Federer came back in a big way - with great confidence, patience in picking up points one by one, staying unperturbed by Gonzalez's charged assault, and impressive variety in his game that I've never seen him display on clay before, so awesome! Although I have to admit that his semi-final win over Gäel Monfils was less than impressive while Nadal delivered an exciting win over Novak Djokovic in his own semi-final match, still, I thought Federer's feat against Gonzalez was going to be a preview of his championship performance. I was so wrong.

And the problem was not that Nadal was playing exceptionally well, because he wasn't. He was playing his usual power game, no extraordinary never-before clay tricks. In fact, some of his vintage Nadal patents, such as dive-for-the-ball, shoot-to-the-air-like-a-rocket-to-save-a-set-point, were never displayed! The problem was, right from the first set, Federer seemed to have doubted his ability to win. All throughout the match, he wasn't trying as hard as he should to win points. His volleys lacked the commitment to get the ball through to the other side of the net, his approaches to the net were so tentative rather than aggressive that didn’t intimidate Nadal at all, and his back court offense lacked the variety to undo Nadal’s usual power defense on the baseline.

The whole of first set, Federer decided to stick to his usual baseline play even when it was clearly not doing anything to dismantle Nadal’s game and instead making him enjoy picking up the points in his comfort zone. Federer lost 6-1 in the process, leaving Nadal unchallenged and bored. He should’ve realized after his serve was broken by Nadal in the very first game of the match that Nadal was willing and prepared to cover the back court all the way to the baseline from side to side - because he can, and therefore must be forced to get inside the court when he least expected it. At a point when he clearly knew that he will not win the first set, it would've increased Federer's chances of winning if he used the remaining games to experiment on effective ploy to derail Nadal, and used it in the second set. Instead, Federer scurried to his defeat in the set, squandering points, finishing without a clear gameplan and with Nadal's championship plot left undecoded. It made me wonder what was happening inside The Master's mind at that time. Whatever it was, it must have been ugly.


In the second set, Federer attempted to serve and volley, approached the net to get Nadal scramble for the ball, but he was not prepared with a plan that will shock and force Nadal to miss. Instead, he handed Nadal several in-your-face opportunities to hit the ball and send it flying behind the ironically enough unsuspecting Federer! Rather than calming himself down, moving on, thinking of a better tactic and fighting back, because, clearly, when Nadal is forced towards the net not in his terms, he misses, either Federer defeatedly hang his head or screamed at himself in frustration – so uncharacteristic of the tennis living great that he is. After his serve was broken at 4-3, he clearly gave up Roland Garros this year. In the third set, he didn't even try: 6-0 in favor of Nadal. And it was painful to watch him reduce himself absolutely remote to the lethal athlete and out-of-this-world tennis genius that he is, eating dust at Roland Garros rather than conquering it.

I imagine that the tremendous expectations by many of a probable date with history was by far a greater burden than actually winning the match, but Federer's classy mastery of the sport always seemed to have immuned him from pressure and he rarely succumbed to raw rage of missing shots eversince he became #1 in the world. That's why it was totally surprising to see him openly showing his frustration in the key points of the match.

Although I still believe that he is the best male tennis player today, and arguably, the best ever, it was disappointing to see that the usually cool and composed Swiss champion was not playing his quiet but aggressive brilliance that always defined his artful mastery and dominance of the sport! He seemed to have lost confidence in his own talents and the motivation and tenacity to win the points one by one through to the championship point! Given that clay is his least favorite surface and that he may not have Nadal’s athletic physique that allowed the Spaniard warrior to move with tremendous flexibility and speed on clay, Roger Federer had the mental toughness, the innate talent that's bigger than anyone else's today, and intelligence to figure out an opponent’s game and come up with a counter attack that forces his opponent to play in his terms. This, while hitting the ball with awesome grace and precision in an artistic tennis court dance that other tennis players could only wish to immitate. Obviously, his advantageous attributes, which may have been enough to disprove Nadal's invincibility on clay, or at the very least posted a threat to Nadal's reign as the King of Roland Garros, were missing in this year’s championship match. I guess, one may be the biggest talent in his sport, but when one lacks faith in his own talents and the commitment to win, some other hungry talents will snatch the prize away from him. Judging from his 35 unforced errors - five times more than his opponent's, this year in the French Open, the worst of Roger Federer defeated the champion in him and handed Rafael Nadal the prize. That may not be fair to Nadal, because surely he, too, is an awesome champion, but I'm pretty sure he would have enjoyed an impassioned challenge from the #1 player in the world and make his historic four straight years of championship victory at Roland Garros as sweet as it should be!

Anyway, next year is another year... El Maestro can try again, and he will. He should. Hopefully, when he returns to center court at Roland Garros next year, and I hope I'm not speaking too soon again, he'd take his awesome genius along and remember what a great champion he truly is! In the meantime, he should figure out how badly he really wants the French Open crown.


Monday, January 21, 2008

2008 Sydney Medibank International: Bye, bye Ana

A tennis fan's celebration of yet another great tennis match from the land down under.
==============================================================

It was bitter-sweet to watch Justine Henin on one end of the court doing what she does best - demolish her opponent with impressive strength and awesome precision, at the same time, watching on the other end, one of the most refreshingly new Serbian talents, Ana Ivanovic, getting her rhythm together to respond to Justine's pounce... uh, quite unsuccessfully in the women's semi-finals of the 2008 Sydney Medibank International. It was perplexing that Statistics seemed to show that Ana was playing better tennis - less unforced errors, less double faults, more winners, etc. but the score put Justine in the lead! Clearly, the big points - those that made spectators rose to their seats with an awestruck gasp - were won by Ana, and quite convincingly, too... but it was Justine who advanced to the finals to lock tennis wits with Svetlana Kuznetsova of Russia where Justine eventually prevailed. Although, it was great to see Justine does her signature backhand with her shoulders and chest completely outstretched sideways to guide the ball right on the line, it was sad to see Ana pack her bags, with her intelligent game and quiet mastery of tennis not to be seen again in this year's remaining part of Medibank International (MI)!

To me, the most unforgettable moment in the 2008 MI's Henin-Ivanovic match was when Justine tried to trick Ana to a slow ball just past the net, which Ana chased with her athletic long legs leaping in a dizzying speed from her backcourt, on the side opposite to where the ball bounced low, towards the net to catch the ball bringing it back to Justine's end of the court, but on the side opposite from where Justine remained standing as she didn't quite expect Ana to be able to return the ball! Like a real champion, Justine reacted just in time and chased the ball with such speed - it seemed to have been more than a hundred steps per minute - at the same time planning to demolish Ana by hitting the ball with enough power and height to bring it to the backcourt way behind where Ana stood, which she executed with great precision. Ana seemed to read Justine's mind. She turned around and went to chase the ball right after Justine hit it. Nobody, including Justine, thought she could catch the ball, but she did! And while she ran, she planned to kill Justine by powering the ball to the backcourt behind Justine, who was waiting for her to miss the shot. Ana executed her plan with such brilliant move that left Justine just following the ball with her eyes as it flew over her with such speed that was impossible for even her champion caliber to catch! A big point for Ana, which she celebrated with the awed crowd with a discreet fistpump and cheeky smile... and Justine acknowledged with a resigned, and maybe admiring, smile! A great moment of tennis - two extremely talented women, both playing with power, precision, intelligence and impressive sportsmanship! Awesome!

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Nobel Forum in Manila


January 9, 2008: Four Nobel Laureates graced the 10th Eurasia Conference on Chemical Sciences with their presence and I was lucky enough to catch them.  

(Photo: The all-excited Philipina with Prof. Hartmut Michel of Germany, the 1988 recipient of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. photo credits:  E. C. Quinto, 10th Eurasia Conference on Chemical Sciences, Philippine International Convention Center)
=============================================================

Stepping aside from behind the podium to show the audience that he was wearing jeans, Prof. Aaron Ciechanover of Israel, the 2004 recipient of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his contribution in the discovery of ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation cheerfully said, “Nobel Laureates are humans, too… see, they wear jeans just like everyone else.” This, as he delivered his 10-minute speech during the Nobel Forum held at the Philippine International Convention Center in Manila on January 9, 2008, in conjunction with the 10th Eurasia Conference on Chemical Sciences. Representing the University of Santo Tomas scientific community, I was one of the lucky few who experienced the rare opportunity of interacting with four Nobel Laureates in a forum where thought-provoking ideas were tossed on the table and challenging questions that are relevant to today’s scientific frontiers were raised.

When asked about the potential of biofuel as a solution to the world’s current quest for alternative fuel, Prof. Hartmut Michel of Germany, the 1988 recipient of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for his contribution in the determination of the three-dimensional structure of a photosynthetic reaction center, commented that biofuel may not be the long-term solution. He explained that the amount of energy stored by plants during photosynthesis is only about 1% of the sun’s energy, and therefore, the maximum energy they can provide is very little. He added that, considering the cost of planting and soil fertilization as well as the elaborate extraction and purification processes that plant oils have to undergo before being utilized as fuel, may be too expensive for the little energy they can provide. He suggested that the use of fuel cells may prove to be a better alternative for a more long-term and sustainable solution. Prof. Yuan Tseh Lee of Taiwan, the 1981 Nobel Prize winner for Chemistry for his contribution to the dynamics of chemical elementary processes, added that biofuel as an alternative fuel may work for countries where there is vast land for plant cultivation, such as the United States of America (USA). However, in countries were agricultural land is scarce and just enough for food production, such as Taiwan, other alternatives have to be explored. He jokingly commented that America’s problems usually become the world’s problems. But American solutions are usually just for America and are rarely applicable for the whole world. To me, this comment is a challenge for all the nations in the world to develop their own scientific capabilities to come up with solutions to problems, local or global, that are most appropriate to them, at the same time, a challenge to use science in making better the plight of all the peoples of the world, rather than using it to get ahead.

Prof. Ryoji Noyori of Japan, the 2001 Nobel Prize winner for Chemistry for his work towards the understanding of chirally catalysed hydrogenation reactions, emphasized the importance of instilling fundamental knowledge and discipline among young people through education. He stressed the importance of equal emphasis on basic and applied sciences in the role of technological innovations to solve the most pressing problems of the world today. Prof. Ciechanover agreed and, in fact, stressed the importance of collaborative science for a more productive scientific community. Prof. Michel pointed out that a deeper understanding of fundamental scientific concepts take patience and time, that’s why, scientific breakthroughs take longer than what some may appreciate. He commented that this is the very reason why the most important scientific findings came out from Europe rather than the USA – because of the tenacity of European scientists to patiently nurture a seed of idea with solid evidences until it becomes a mature fruit of understanding that does not erode with latest advancements, as opposed to the rat race-driven approach of the Americans to bring a scientific concept to commercialization. 

Having studied and been engaged in research in both Europe and the USA, I do have a very strong appreciation of the “contemplative approach” to scientific pursuits that defines the European scientific psyche – it makes those “eureka moments” such immeasurable delight that fuel one’s will to keep going no matter how hard the quest is. Perhaps, the American approach is a more practical one, which seeks to put a solid scientific concept to good use within the shortest possible time... although, I have to admit, that the “competition factor” is way too heavy for a scientist to bear to fully experience and appreciate those “eureka moments”. It would be great to do science just for the love of it and its benefits to humankind, rather than just to get ahead, or get the patent for the technology, or being the one to sell the technology to the highest bidder, or just to win the Nobel Prize - all superficial reasons for doing science. As Prof. Lee said, although money can be a driving force of innovation, creativity, which roots from intellectual curiosity, is stifled when intellectual superficiality persists. Prof. Ciechanover put it very candidly but meaningfully, "winning the Nobel Prize was not my objective, rather it was a consequence of ardently pursuing a passion." And, what a wonderful and fulfilling consequence it must have been!

If I were to sum this argument up having been immersed in both the European and American scientific communities, I would say that if one wants to specialize in the basic sciences, such as Chemistry and Physics, perhaps, the European approach would be the most fulfilling approach, but if one wants to specialize in applied sciences where commercialization is usually the end, perhaps, the American approach would suit him better. Just to illustrate, when I asked the Laureates of their opinion on the remark once made on nanotechnology being a “shotgun wedding” between the basic and applied sciences, Prof. Lee commented that nanotechnology is nothing new to the basic scientists because they have been studying this since many years back, but no one has called the area “nanotechnology” until recently, to which I agree completely. In fact, I would say that John Dalton is among the frontliners of “nanochemistry” - the "nano building blocks" of nanotechnology! But, I believe that the first person to actively put forward nanotechnology and its relevance to today’s technological innovation-driven world was an engineer from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – an applied scientist from an American institution – when he was pointing out the exciting applications of the then young scientific area. From then on, the “nano pursuit” had been relentless!

To me, whether basic science or applied science, pursued by the European or American approach, the bottom line is always whether our scientific pursuits are geared towards the betterment of humanity or just towards personal gain. As Prof. Ciechanover said, “I don’t know basic science and applied science. I only know good science and bad science.”